• ChesReport (current)
  • Marine Invasions Lab
  • Partner Portals
    Nemesis California Panama Galapagos Cocos Island NP JTMD
    Archived Projects
    Chesapeake
  • Browse Species
    Taxonomic Groups All Species
  • News
  • login
You are viewing an archived site. The Chesapeake Bay Introduced Species Database project ended in 2020 and the database is no longer receiving updates. Learn more…
Image of Amphibalanus amphitrite

Amphibalanus amphitrite

Crustaceans

Striped Barnacle

The striped acorn barnacle was first described by Darwin in 1854. Its native range is difficult to determine because it is part of a complex of similar species and prone to transport on ships' hulls. It may be native throughout the West Pacific and Indian Oceans from Southeastern Africa to Southern China. It has been introduced to the Eastern Pacific (Panama-California), Northwestern Pacific (Korea-Japan-Russia), Southwestern Pacific (including New Zealand and possibly Southern Australia), Pacific Islands (Hawaii), Western Atlantic (Caribbean-Long Island Sound), and Northeastern Atlantic (Germany-England-France). It is a frequent fouling organism and can grow on a wide range of hard surfaces, including docks, ships' hulls, logs, mangroves, rocks and bivalve shells.

Image Credit: Melissa Frey, Royal BC Museum

Description Taxonomy Invasion History Ecology Impacts References

Description

Balanus amphitrite (Striped Barnacle) is a member of the 'B. amphitrite' species complex, containing many similar species, which at times have been named as varieties of B. amphitrite. Currently, only two subspecies of B. amphitrite are recognized, B. amphitrite amphitrite, now distributed worldwide in warm waters, and B. amphitrite saltonensis, known from the Salton Sea and the Pacific Coast (CA) (Henry and McLaughlin 1975).

Potentially Misidentified Species - Barnacles occurring in or near Chesapeake Bay, and previously identified in the literature as varieties of B. amphitrite are listed below, with names of describers, (not in parentheses or in references):

Balanus subalbidus [known as B. amphitrite pallidus Henry 1954, in part (Henry and McLaughlin 1975)]; Balanus eburnus [known as B. amphitrite niveus Olivera 1941, in part (Henry and McLaughlin 1975)].

Balanus improvisus [known as B. amphitrite pallidus, in part, Nillson-Cantell 1932, B. amphitrite amphitrite Stubbings 1967 (Henry and McLaughlin 1975)].


Balanus venustus [known as B. amphitrite venustus Darwin 1854, B. amphitrite modestus Darwin 1854; B. amphitrite inexpectatus Nillson-Cantell 1933; B. amphitrite obscurus Darwin 1854; B. amphitrite niveus Pilsbry 1916; B. amphitrite denticulata Stubbings 1961; (Henry and McLaughlin 1975)]. Balanus venustus is predominantly subtidal, down to depths of 55 m, while B. amphitrite is mostly intertidal (Zullo 1966).

Specimens of 'B. a. pallidus' from Solomons and St. Marys MD in United States National Museum of National History collections are probably B. improvisus, but possibly B. subalbidus. 'B. a. niveus' from Martha's Vineyard, Narragansett Bay, and NC, are probably B. venustus. br/>
Pitombo (2005) raised the 'Balanus amphitrite group, including B. amphitrite to the status of a genus, Amphibalanus.


Taxonomy

Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Animalia Crustacea Cirripedia Thoracica Balanidae Balanus

Synonyms

Balanus amphitrite; Balanus amphitrite var. communis, Balanus amphitrite forma hawaiiensis, Balanus amphitrite var. denticulata, Balanus amphitrite venustus, Balanus amphitrite cochinensis, Balanus amphitrite fluminiensis, Balanus amphitrite herzi

Invasion History

Chesapeake Bay Status

First Record Population Range Introduction Residency Source Region Native Region Vectors
1967 Established Stable Introduced Regular Resident Unknown-Marine Western Pacific Shipping(Ballast Water,Fouling Community)

History of Spread

Amphibalanus amphitrite (Striped Barnacle) is a cosmopolitan barnacle in tropical to warm-temperate waters, whose movements have been difficult to interpret because of its complex taxonomy. The Indo-Pacific is the likeliest region of origin (Cohen and Carlton 1995). In the West Pacific and Indian Ocean, it ranges from Vladivostok, Russia, to Southeast Africa (Henry and McLaughlin 1975). It is 'extremely common on ship's bottoms' (Darwin 1854), and appears to have been introduced over much of its present range, including most or all of the Atlantic Basin (Bishop 1950; Zullo 1966; Zullo 1992) (Carlton et al. 1969; Cohen and Carlton 1995; Zullo et al. 1972). Specimens were collected in England as early as 1917 (Bishop 1950), but this species is confined to the warmer south coast, and is abundant in thermal effluents (Raymont 1976). A. amphitrite was first collected in HI in the early 1900's and on the coast of CA (La Jolla) in 1921 (Zullo et al. 1972), and is abundant from Mexico to San Francisco (and probably beyond) (Cohen and Carlton 1995; Henry and McLauglin 1975).

Amphibalanus amphitrite may have been introduced to the Caribbean, including FL before the mid-19th century (Darwin 1854), and is abundant as far south as Argentina (Calcogno et al. 1997). Darwin believed he had found barnacles intergrading from 'A. a. communis' (A. amphitrite) to 'A. a. niveus', (A. venustus), from the West Indies and FL (Darwin 1854, p. 246). However, A. amphitrite apparently was not found on the Atlantic Coast of the United States by Pilsbry (1916). 'Evidence for the invasion of A. a. amphitrite is purely circumstantial, but nonetheless convincing. Pilsbry did not identify it in any of the collections either at the United States National Museum of Natural History or the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, and examination of the National Museum failed to uncover any specimens collected prior to World War II. Other evidence was obtained from examination of Pliocene and Pleistocene fossils from the Atlantic Coastal Plain of FL in the United States Geological Survey collection. Amphibalanus amphitrite amphitrite was not found, although A. venustus niveus was common. Not as much weight can be given to this negative evidence, since the predominantly intertidal habits of A. a. amphitrite might detract from its preservation' (Zullo 1966). Northwest Atlantic records of A. a. amphitrite are summarized below:

Gulf of Mexico - Tampa Bay FL 1954; Panama City 1964; Boca Ciega Bay 1955; Veracruz Mexico 1965 (Henry and McLaughlin 1975; United States National Museum of Natural History collections). It was collected at Pass Christian MS and probably also at Port Aransas TX. (Zullo 1966).

FL, Atlantic Coast - It was reported from Miami in 1963 (Henry and McLaughlin 1975; United States National Museum of Natural History collections). Settlement was recorded on fouling plates from the 1950's onward, but identification of A. amphitrite may have been uncertain before 1962 (Moore et al. 1974). It was reported from Fernandina Beach and the Jacksonville area (Zullo 1966).

NC - It was collected in Beaufort NC in 1955, (Henry and McLaughlin 1975; United States National Museum of Natural History collections) and described as 'a conspicuous element in the mid and low intertidal at Beaufort' (Henry 1959), Morehead City, and Wrightsville Beach, NC (Zullo 1966).

Chesapeake Bay - It was collected in Norfolk VA at Lynnhaven Inlet in 1967 (Henry and McLaughlin 1975). It was reported for the lower Chesapeake Bay, 'scarce' (Van Engel et al. 1972). In 2004, Amphibalanus amphitrite was identified from several fouling plates from Lynnhaven Bay, collected in 2000-2004 (Ruiz et al. unpublished data; Jana Seeger, personal communication).

Cape Cod - Four individuals were collected from pilings in West Bay, Hyannis MA on the south side of Cape in 1963. Two of these were maintained in a running seawater system, but died in December when the temperature reached 1.5 C (Zullo 1966). 'These specimens probably represented the spat of individuals carried north from warmer waters' (Zullo 1966).

History References - Bishop 1950; Calcogno et al. 1997; Carlton et al. 1969; Cohen and Carlton 1995; Darwin 1854; Henry 1959; Henry and McLaughlin 1975; Moore et al. 1974; Pilsbry 1916; Van Engel et al. 1972; Zullo 1966; Zullo et al. 1972; Zullo 1979; Zullo 1992

Invasion Comments

History of Spread - Records of 'Amphibalanus amphitrite niveus' from Cape Henry VA, 1959, and 'A. a. pallidus', from Solomons and St. Marys MD (United States National Museum of Natural History collections) refer to A. venustus and A. subalbidus respectively.

Ecology

Environmental Tolerances

For SurvivalFor Reproduction
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Temperature (ºC) 1.5 32.0 15.0 32.0
Salinity (‰) 10.0 44.0 10.0 44.0
Oxygen
pH
Salinity Range poly-eu

Age and Growth

Male Female
Minimum Adult Size (mm) 5.5 5.5
Typical Adult Size (mm) 9.0 9.0
Maximum Adult Size (mm) 15.0 15.0
Maximum Longevity (yrs) 5.5 5.5
Typical Longevity (yrs 1.0 1.0

Reproduction

Start Peak End
Reproductive Season
Typical Number of Young
Per Reproductive Event
Sexuality Mode(s)
Mode(s) of Asexual
Reproduction
Fertilization Type(s)
More than One Reproduction
Event per Year
Reproductive Startegy
Egg/Seed Form

Impacts

Economic Impacts in Chesapeake Bay

Amphibalanus amphitrite (Striped Barnacle) is apparently too scarce to have significant econmic impacts in the Chesapeake region.


Economic Impacts Outside of Chesapeake Bay

Amphibalanus amphitrite (Striped Barnacle) is an important fouler of ships and marine structures worldwide in warm waters (Shkedy et al. 1995), and in heated discharges in England, and probably elsewhere (Raymont 1976).

References- Raymont 1976; Shkedy et al. 1995


Ecological Impacts on Chesapeake Native Species

Impacts of Amphibalanus amphitrite (Striped Barnacle) are considered minor because of this barnacle's scarcity in the Chesapeake region. In areas with suitable temperature regimes, it is a major colonizer of artificial structures in England and Israel (Bishop 1950; Shkedy et al. 1995), areas affected by thermal plumes, in England (Raymont 1976), and estuaries affected by sewage discharges, Argentina (Calcogno et al. 1997). At each of these sites, A. amphitrite is rare outside disturbed areas, and is the dominant form within them, suggesting that it may outcompete native barnacles in disturbed environments. As temperature decreased in a heated dock in England, the native Balanus crenatus appeared, and was presumed to be competing with A. amphitrite (Raymont 1976).

References- Bishop 1950; Calcogno et al. 1997; Shkedy et al. 1995; Raymont 1976


Ecological Impacts on Other Chesapeake Non-Native Species

Amphibalanuss amphitrite (Striped Barnacle) is apparently too rare in the Chesapeake Bay region to affect other fouling biota. However, in regions affected by thermal plumes, it could compete for space and food with other introduced organisms (Raymont 1976).

References- Raymont 1976


References


Direct questions and comments to chesnemo@si.edu.

©